Content
Over 90% of users saw increased regrowth or reduced hair loss in clinical trials
There are two main types of hair transplant techniques: follicular unit extraction (FUE) and follicular unit transplantation (FUT). Both are effective — but what are the pros and cons of FUE versus FUT?
When done correctly, hair transplant surgery can be a worthwhile investment for those who want a head full of healthy-looking hair. But when considering a hair transplant, you’ll need to think about which method you prefer.
Both FUE and FUT techniques can produce natural-looking results, but they differ significantly in cost, recovery time, and scarring.
To help you make your decision, we’ll explain the differences between FUT and FUE hair transplant techniques, the FUT versus FUE cost, and everything else you need to know below.
Content
Both FUT and FUE hair transplant procedures are effective at treating hair loss. In fact, both have high success rates.
For FUT procedures, healthcare professionals remove a strip of hair follicles from your head where others may not notice it’s missing. The donor hair follicles are then transplanted to an area where your hair is thinning — that is, a recipient site. The main drawback of FUT is the linear scar it can leave on the donor area of the scalp, usually on the back of the head.
FUE is a newer type of hair transplant. During FUE procedures, healthcare professionals select individual hair follicles to transplant to the recipient area via “micropunches” or small holes that leave barely noticeable scars. Although FUE transplants take longer, they are less invasive, produce minimal scarring, and require a shorter recovery time.
According to a 2022 survey by the International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery, FUE transplants are more popular than FUT.
But FUT hair transplants have their benefits. The procedure is faster than the FUE technique, and FUT can cover a larger area of your scalp, making it a good choice if you have a significant bald patch.
It’s also worth noting that you can get an FUE procedure after an FUT procedure but not vice versa. So, if you opt for an FUT transplant, you can get an FUE transplant at a later stage if necessary.
The FUT technique is also called the “strip method.”
During an FUT procedure, a hair transplant surgeon will remove a strip of skin from a part of your scalp with healthy, functional hair follicles. Usually, surgeons use the back of the head as the donor site.
The exact size of the strip depends on the amount of hair you need to cover your bald spots. But usually, the strip of scalp is a maximum of 1.5 centimeters (0.4 to 0.6 inches) wide.
The surgeon then divides the strips into smaller groups of follicles and transplants these units into the recipient area — for example, your hairline or the crown of your head.
The grafts are generally large enough that complete hair restoration can often be achieved in just one or two sessions.
The FUE method is a newer type of hair transplant that transfers individual follicular units of hair from your skin to balding areas or areas with thinning hair. The surgeon then replaces dead hair follicles with healthy follicles that can grow new hair.
Because the FUE technique involves transplanting individual follicles, it takes longer than the FUT technique.
Compared to FUT hair transplants, the FUE method involves making smaller incisions, which results in minimal scarring.
4.5 average rating
Is FUT better than FUE? Or vice versa?
When weighing the FUE versus FUT pros and cons, it’s important to consider your unique situation. While one technique might work best for your buddy, you might opt for a different procedure because of your circumstances.
FUT might be a better choice if you:
Want to cover a larger bald patch
Want a higher graft count in one session
Don’t mind having a visible linear scar until your hair grows to cover it
Might have a second transplant at a later stage
Want to finish your transplant in one session, which will be about eight hours
Are on a tighter budget
FUE might be a better choice if you:
Don’t want a visible linear scar
Don’t mind multiple shorter sessions, because FUE sessions can be broken up into about four two-hour appointments
Don’t want another hair transplant in the future
Prefer a shorter healing time
Want to avoid an invasive procedure
Can afford a more costly surgery
As you can tell, both types of procedures have their benefits and drawbacks. If you’re struggling to decide, speaking with an expert might help. Some hair transplant clinics offer a free consultation for prospective patients.
Now, let’s get down to a question you may be nervous about: How much will your hair transplant cost?
In most cases, FUE is more expensive than FUT. In fact, FUE can be two or three times the cost of FUT.
Generally, you can expect to invest between $6,000 and $12,000 in hair transplant surgery. Some clinics charge per graft, while others charge per session.
Yep, that’s a pretty high price — and a pretty wide range. The cost will depend on:
The surgeon you choose
Whether you opt for FUE or FUT
The city or town and clinic where you have your surgery
The number of hair grafts you’ll need
The complexity of your case
Typically, health insurance doesn’t cover hair transplant surgery, as it’s considered a cosmetic procedure.
If the cost of a transplant isn’t in your budget right now, consider more cost-effective hair loss treatment options.
We offer a wide variety of FDA-approved prescription treatments like finasteride and over-the-counter options, like minoxidil foam and minoxidil solution.
Hair restoration surgeries — both FUT and FUE — are generally very safe when performed by board-certified surgeons.
The most common post-op effect is that your scalp may be tender for a few days. Your surgeon might recommend using an over-the-counter pain medication to take the edge off.
In all hair transplant surgeries, there’s a chance that some or all of the hair grafts won’t “take” or regrow, or hair may grow back in uneven patches. In either of these cases, healthcare professionals often recommend additional attempts.
Possible hair transplant surgery complications are often mild but include:
Bleeding on the scalp
Swelling caused by excess fluids (edema)
Inflammation of the hair follicles (folliculitis) of the transplanted hair
Numbness of the scalp
Epidermal cysts and ingrown hair
It’s also possible to experience an infection after hair transplant surgery. Fewer than 1 percent of patients experience this adverse effect. You can treat infections by exfoliating with warm compresses, shampooing twice a day, and taking any antibiotics your doctor prescribes.
Lastly, it’s normal to experience hair shedding — called shock loss — in the first few weeks after a hair transplant. This is a sign your transplanted hair follicles are entering the hair growth cycle, and your hairs will start regrowing within the next few months.
Shock loss is generally temporary. If you’re willing to be patient, you’ll be rewarded with more abundant and thicker hair.
If you are struggling with male pattern baldness, you may be considering FUT or FUE hair transplants. Both hair transplant techniques are permanent and will eventually give you a fuller head of hair — but there are some key differences between the two.
FUE is the more popular choice. It’s less invasive and doesn’t leave visible scarring. It’s also less painful and has a shorter recovery time.
FUT may be more successful for significant hair loss. FUT hair transplants can be better for people who want a large area covered in only one session.
Pricing varies widely. Hair transplants can be expensive, and the costs can vary depending on the number of grafts you need and the surgeon you choose. Generally speaking, FUT tends to be cheaper.
You might want to consider other hair loss treatments if hair transplant surgery is out of your budget for now.
Regardless of what you choose, it’s a good idea to start by talking with an expert. We can help you book an online appointment with a healthcare professional. They will be able to assess your hair loss, suggest treatment options, and talk you through the pros and cons of FUE versus FUT for your individual circumstances.
Hims & Hers has strict sourcing guidelines to ensure our content is accurate and current. We rely on peer-reviewed studies, academic research institutions, and medical associations. We strive to use primary sources and refrain from using tertiary references. See a mistake? Let us know at [email protected]!
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. The information contained herein is not a substitute for and should never be relied upon for professional medical advice. Always talk to your doctor about the risks and benefits of any treatment. Learn more about our editorial standards here.
Dr. Knox Beasley is a board certified dermatologist specializing in hair loss. He completed his undergraduate studies at the United States Military Academy at West Point, NY, and subsequently attended medical school at Tulane University School of Medicine in New Orleans, LA.
Dr. Beasley first began doing telemedicine during his dermatology residency in 2013 with the military, helping to diagnose dermatologic conditions in soldiers all over the world.
Dr. Beasley is board certified by the American Board of Dermatology, and is a Fellow of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Originally from Nashville, TN, Dr. Beasley currently lives in North Carolina and enjoys spending time outdoors (with sunscreen of course) with his wife and two children in his spare time.
Bachelor of Science, Life Sciences. United States Military Academy.
Doctor of Medicine. Tulane University School of Medicine
Dermatology Residency. San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium
Board Certified. American Board of Dermatology
Wilson, L. M., Beasley, K. J., Sorrells, T. C., & Johnson, V. V. (2017). Congenital neurocristic cutaneous hamartoma with poliosis: A case report. Journal of cutaneous pathology, 44(11), 974–977. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cup.13027
Banta, J., Beasley, K., Kobayashi, T., & Rohena, L. (2016). Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis (Haberland syndrome): A mild case with bilateral cutaneous and ocular involvement. JAAD case reports, 2(2), 150–152. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867906/
Patterson, A. T., Beasley, K. J., & Kobayashi, T. T. (2016). Fibroelastolytic papulosis: histopathologic confirmation of disease spectrum variants in a single case. Journal of cutaneous pathology, 43(2), 142–147. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cup.12569
Beasley, K., Panach, K., & Dominguez, A. R. (2016). Disseminated Candida tropicalis presenting with Ecthyma-Gangrenosum-like Lesions. Dermatology online journal, 22(1), 13030/qt7vg4n68j. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26990472/
Kimes, K., Beasley, K., & Dalton, S. R. (2015). Eruptive milia and comedones during treatment with dovitinib. Dermatology online journal, 21(9), 13030/qt8kw141mb. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26437285/
Miladi, A., Thomas, B. C., Beasley, K., & Meyerle, J. (2015). Angioimmunoblastic t-cell lymphoma presenting as purpura fulminans. Cutis, 95(2), 113–115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25750965/
Beasley K, Dai JM, Brown P, Lenz B, Hivnor CM. (2013). Ablative Fractional Versus Nonablative Fractional Lasers – Where Are We and How Do We Compare Differing Products?. Curr Dermatol Rep, 2, 135–143. https://idp.springer.com/authorize?response_type=cookie&client_id=springerlink&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs13671-013-0043-0
Siami P, Beasley K, Woolen S, Zahn J. (2012). A retrospective study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of intra-abdominal once-yearly histrelin acetate subcutaneous implant in patients with advanced prostate cancer. UroToday Int J, June 5(3), art 26. https://www.urotoday.com/volume-5-2012/vol-5-issue-3/51132-a-retrospective-study-evaluating-the-efficacy-and-tolerability-of-intra-abdominal-once-yearly-histrelin-acetate-subcutaneous-implants-in-patients-with-advanced-prostate-cancer.html
Siami P, Beasley K. (2012). Dutasteride with As-Needed Tamsulosin in Men at Risk of Benign Prostate Hypertrophy Progression. UroToday Int J, Feb 5(1), art 93. https://www.urotoday.com/volume-5-2012/vol-5-issue-1/48691-dutasteride-with-as-needed-tamsulosin-in-men-at-risk-of-benign-prostatic-hypertrophy-progression.html